Saturday, February 1, 2014

BIG BAD WOLVES




“Big Bad Wolves” has got a lot of press recently after Quentin Tarantino named it the best film that he had seen in 2013.  Just from this simple comment made, the awareness of “Big Bad Wolves” has risen dramatically and has given distributors the perfect quote to promote and market the film.  However in late August of last year, one week after MIFF finished, “Big Bad Wolves” was one of the titles that made up the Israeli Film Festival that screened in Australia.  Back then, not a whole lot was known about the film except that it was the new film by Aharon Keshales and Navot Papushado, who previously directed the entertaining horror/comedy “Rabies”.  Due to being so burnt out from MIFF, I did not have it in me to write a review back then, but now that it has just been released in the United States, I feel it is the perfect time to revisit “Big Bad Wolves”.

After a series of brutal murders (with the victims always being young girls), the Israeli Police force believes that they have found their man, however due to the fact they have no evidence to prove their suspicions, Micki and two other cops decide to take the suspect, Dror, to an abandoned warehouse in an attempt to get a confession from the man and to tell the whereabouts of where his latest victim is.  Suffering through the beatings, Dror is adamant that they have the wrong man and that he is innocent of the crimes he is being accused of.  The beating continues until Micki’s superior gets wind of what is going on and demands that Micki let the guy go and to return to the station.  Unbeknown to Micki was the fact that an eyewitness was in the abandoned factory and recorded the police brutality which is then immediately uploaded to youtube.  Things get worse for Micki as the body of the missing girl is found, although the corpse is missing its head.  The higher ups determine that this action may have occurred in retaliation to the beating Dror coped, if he is indeed the killer.  Either way Micki is fired from his job due to his mishandling of the case.  No longer a cop, Micki decides the only way to get back on the force is to prove he is right and decides he will kidnap the suspect and torture him until he gets the confession he is after.  However, he walks right into the path of Gidi, the father of the latest victim, who has the same idea as Micki.  After a brief conversation, the two decide to team up in an attempt to crack the man they assume is the cause of their pain.

It is very easy to see why Quentin Tarantino would be attracted to “Big Bad Wolves”.  The film is ultimately a tale of revenge that is full of scenes of intense torture.  There is a lot of good in the film but I did have a major problem with it and that was its inconsistent tone.  Maybe inconsistent is the wrong word here but while the film is definitely a thriller, there is also a lot of comedy in it too.  In my opinion, I think that Keshales and Papushado were attempting something that the Coen Brothers are fantastic at but is very hard to do and that is to come up with quite the dark tale but infuse it with black comedy throughout.  If they could have pulled this off, “Big Bad Wolves” would have been sensational, but unfortunately the comedy in the film is just too broad and silly that it ends up taking the edge off the drama and thriller aspects of the film entirely.  Another issue I had with the comedy is that it was a bit too repetitive; the joke was always the same.  Gidi is about to enact brutal torture on Dror when his mother rings him, or his cake has to come out of the oven.  While it may be funny once, the joke of always being interrupted wears thin after awhile.  The fact that the film deals with quite heavy topics like paedophilia, rape, torture and murder is another reason I find that the comedy falls flat because there really is nothing to laugh about when it comes to these topics in regards to young children.

Two strong points that the movie has is its fantastic score and its gorgeous visuals however again, what we see and hear does not correspond with the tone of the film, which causes a clash of sorts as we have different elements of the film fighting one another which obviously hurts the film as a whole.  Both the visuals and particularly the score are made as if for a pure thriller, so it comes across a little strange when the music is dramatic and suspenseful, while comedy is being portrayed on screen.  Do not get me wrong, I am not against having comedy in this film, it is just that I think it has been handled poorly and far too broad.  In terms of the visuals and cinematography, I got a real Park Chan-Wook and Kim Jee-Woon feel to it all, which is a massive complement.  Every frame just has an exact feel to it, like it has been clearly worked out well before shooting.  From a technical point of view, it is obvious to see that Keshales and Papushado have drastically improved in their direction and appear to be much more confident in their talents.  They show great competency in using a number of camera techniques but really excel in their use of slow motion.  Every time a child is on screen, the film reverts to slow motion which adds to the fairy tale like atmosphere and also increases the suspense of the scene.

The title “Big Bad Wolves” immediately invokes the visual world of fairy tales, and while the majority of the film abandons that idea, it is brought to the forefront in the incredible opening scene.  This scene is absolute genius and is the best thing about the film by a mile as we witness three young children playing an innocent game of “hide and seek”.  As I mentioned, the entire scene is shot in slow motion, as we watch the two girls laughing and looking for a place to hide while the boy is counting.  We see one girl hide in a free standing wardrobe, while the other finds her own place to hide.  She is immediately found, and when the boy finally opens the wardrobe expecting to find the other girl, all that remains is a single red shoe, symbolising that she has been kidnapped.  It is a grandiose opening sequence that sadly the rest of the film does not hold up to, but in fairness, the majority of the film is shot in a completely different style.

“Bad Bad Wolves” mines similar ground to Denis Villeneuve’s “Prisoners” where the (perceived) hunter suddenly becomes the hunted.  We watch once normal men do horrible things to another human being in an attempt to find their daughters and we, the audience, are asked to think about whether these men, through these deeds, are just as bad as the antagonists they are torturing.  While their intentions may be honourable, does this mean anything if the way they go about it is totally inhumane and illegal, or to put it simply; does the end justify the means?  Thankfully neither film gives an answer to the question, rather they leave it up to the viewer to make up their own mind, but once again due to the tone of “Big Bad Wolves”, I found the questions asked carried less gravitas than those in “Prisoners” even though they are closely related.  It is hard to be jovial about a dark subject and then expect the audience to answer questions posed by the filmmakers in a more serious manner than they are themselves.

Looking over this review, you would swear that it was a negative one, but at the end of the day, there was a lot about “Big Bad Wolves” that I liked and I can see myself revisiting it again in the future.  The reason I am harping so much on the negatives is that I am frustrated because as good as it is, it had the opportunity to be so much better.  The film has some high points; the opening sequence, the film’s gorgeous visual style and impressive score, but they seem to be constantly fighting against the uneven tone of the picture.  As you may have guessed by now, I believe the filmmakers have made a huge error in judgement regarding the tone of “Big Bad Wolves” but everything else has been done really well. Technically the film is a big improvement from “Rabies” and I look future to future films from this talented Israeli pair.


3.5 Stars.


Wednesday, January 29, 2014

2013 - IN REVIEW: MOST ANTICIPATED FILMS OF 2014



Just like every other year that has gone before it, there are a plethora of new releases that I am looking forward to seeing in 2014.   We have a brand new David Fincher film (“Gone Girl”), the Mo Brothers follow up to “Macabre” (“Killers”), Denis Villeneuve’s first collaboration with Jake Gyllenhaal (“Enemy”), the latest from Jean-Pierre Jeunet (“The Young & Prodigious Spivet”), and a mammoth two-part film from Lars Von Trier (“Nymphomaniac”), and I am still waiting for Bong Joon-Ho’s “Snowpiercer” to be released.   But to list every single feature I am anticipating would take forever and a day, so I am only going to highlight my six most anticipated releases of 2014, starting with:



Contrary to everyone else in the world, I was not one who went absolutely ga-ga for Wes Anderson’s previous film “Moonrise Kingdom”, but believe me, it surprised me more than anyone.  I am a massive fan of Wes Anderson, so it came as a bit of a shock to be completely underwhelmed by one of his features.  However from all of the trailers that have come out for his follow-up “The Grand Budapest Hotel”, it looks as though he may have created his most entertaining film yet.  Having the film set in three different time periods (each shot in a different aspect ratio) looks interesting, but it is the quirky murder mystery storyline that really excites me.  That, and it is great to finally see Ralph Fiennes do something completely different and he looks to be in career best form here.  As usual for Anderson, the design of the film and its quirks are specific to the director and instantly recognizable, which gets me once again pumped for the film, but I must remind myself that it was these same quirks that I found so self conscious and annoying in “Moonrise Kingdom” and temper my expectations before going in.  That said, “The Grand Budapest Hotel” looks like a rollicking good time, if nothing else.



This film has the biggest question mark next to it because it could be anything, everything or nothing.  Because this is Ryan Gosling’s directorial debut, it is unknown just how much talent the guy has in that department, but knowing the kinds of movies he commits himself to when acting and the sort of directors he likes working with, I am pretty confident that this is going to be a special film.  If nothing else it sounds original.  Here is the official plot description for the film: “"A dark fantasy/neo-noir about a single mother (Christina Hendricks) who gets lost in the criminal underworld, while her son discovers a road leading to an underwater utopia."   Personally I think it sounds amazing especially the part about the underwater utopia; it just brings to mind some amazing visuals that I hope Gosling can capture.  Aside from Hendricks, Gosling has filled his cast with Saoirse Ronan, Eva Mendes, Ben Mendelsohn and Barbara Steele (!), while behind the camera he has got the great Benoit Debie as his director of photography.  I admit I am expecting big things from “How To Catch A Monster”, and think it has the potential to be the surprise hit of the year, but I also understand that it has the potential to go the other way too.  Either way, I cannot wait to see this film.



David Michod’s directorial debut, “Animal Kingdom”, absolutely blew my mind when it came out.  I adored the film and was stunned by just how brilliant a director Michod was with his first feature.  He was so assured and precise and obviously knew exactly what he wanted and what he delivered was masterful.  It was obvious too that he had a knack of collaborating with actors and getting the best out of them because “Animal Kingdom” is filled with stunning performances and even saw Jacki Weaver garner an Oscar nomination.  Whatever Michod did next, I was always going to be first in line for and “The Rover” is that new film.  Here is the official plot description for it: “….is set in the Australian desert in a dangerous and dysfunctional near future. Eric has left everything and every semblance of human kindness behind him. When his last possession, his car, is stolen by a gang of dangerous criminals, Eric sets off to track them down and is forced along the way to enlist the help of Reynolds, the naive member of the gang left behind in the bloody chaos of the gang's most recent escape.”  From the still above, it looks as though this is going to be an intense film and it makes obvious that Michod has reteamed with Guy Pearce who plays the role Eric.  The role of Reynolds surprisingly went to Robert Pattison and hopefully behind Michod’s steady hand we can see the best of this actor and something completely different.  



Any time Paul Thomas Anderson makes a film, it is an event and should not be missed.  He is a director that has yet to make a bad film, but what makes “Inherent Vice” so compelling is that after two somber character pieces, it looks like Anderson has returned to having “fun” with his new film.  “Inherent Vice” is adapted from Thomas Pynchon’s novel of the same name and is about “…a drug-fueled detective…” named “Larry "Doc" Sportello” who “… investigates the disappearance of a former girlfriend.”  The film is set in Los Angeles in the 1970’s and I must say that I am getting a serious “The Long Goodbye” vibe from it which makes me very excited.  Anderson has reteamed with Joaquin Phoenix who plays the detective and has filled his cast with some stunning actors the likes of Josh Brolin, Reese Witherspoon, Jena Malone, Owen Wilson and Martin Short.  The other news of note regarding this film is that Robert Elswit returns as Anderson’s director of photography for “Inherent Vice” after missing “The Master”.  This thing can only be a hit in my eyes and I am so looking forward to it, and it is also great to get a new film from Paul Thomas Anderson so soon after “The Master”.



While it is well known that Tim Burton and his films have been inconsistent lately, I am not one of those that thinks the director has lost it and does not have another good film in him.  After all, his best film “Sweeney Todd” only came out seven years ago.  I will admit that I think Burton needs to find something fresh and work with different actors again in an attempt to re-capture his early brilliance and he may have found this opportunity with “Big Eyes”.  This film is something completely unique in Burton’s filmography  as it is a drama focusing on Margaret Keane, an artist who first found acclaim in the 1950’s and whose work was instantly recognizable due to the big doe-eyes she drew in her subjects that usually consisted of children or women.  The film charts her success and her subsequent legal battles with her husband, Walter, after he attempts to claim the work as his own.  As you can see, this is nothing like anything Burton has tackled before but the most exciting thing about “Big Eyes” is that the script is written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski who were the geniuses behind Tim Burton’s other perfect film, “Ed Wood”.  And the cast?  Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter are nowhere to be seen, instead we have a completely new group of actors who have never worked with the director before with Amy Adams and Christoph Waltz filling out the roles of Margaret and Water Keane.  The director of photography for “Big Eyes” is the extremely talented Bruno Delbonnel (check out his stunning work in the Coen Brother’s recent film “Inside Llewyn Davis”) who also shot Burton’s “Dark Shadows” so it will definitely be a beautiful looking film.  At the end of the day, I think “Big Eyes” is going to be a small film that may struggle to find an audience in today’s market, but in terms of quality I think it has the potential to be very special and it will hopefully be another gem in Tim Burton’s career.



My most anticipated film of “2014” is the martial arts actioner “The Raid 2: Berandal”.  While I am a little embarrassed that my most anticipated movie isn’t something more highbrow, I am not going to apologize for my love of visceral, kinetic cinema.  The original film I declared as the best action film I had seen in a decade, and I stand by that.  It is a brutal and stunning film full of amazingly choreographed fights and mayhem.  The sequel has been opened up considerably by not being contained in a single location and increasing the number of characters ten-fold.  The film kicks off right at the spot the original finished, and becomes something of a crime epic as Rama is forced to go undercover into a prison to befriend the son of the biggest crime boss in Indonesia, in an attempt to destroy the organization from the inside.  The film premiered at Sundance earlier this week and the response has been incredibly positive with almost unanimous reports stating that it outdoes the original in every facet.  This is almost unbelievable but apparently the film is chock full of pulse pounding action the likes never seen before, and I have seen it mentioned as the “best action film ever made”.  While that sounds like hyperbole, I will admit it has got me even more excited to see the film.  It was obvious in the first film that director Gareth Evans understands action and how to film it, but it also appears that he has the ability to tell a grand sweeping crime epic too.  As of yet the film does not have an Australian release date, which kills me, but it does come out in the U.S on March 28, which means that the blu-ray release of the film will arrive before the end of the year.  Hopefully I wont have to wait that long to see this two and a half hour martial arts epic, because as I said before this is my most anticipated film of 2014.


Well, that is it.  My enormous round up of the year that was 2013 is finally over.  Hopefully you enjoyed reading it and got something out of it, but how about we go back to watching some new films now?

Monday, January 27, 2014

2013 - IN REVIEW: TOP TWENTY BEST FILMS: #10 - 1





10.  STOKER

Another coming of age tale, but one that is completely different to “Mud”, because when India Stoker finds and grows into her true self, she becomes someone not as innocent as you would expect.  “Stoker” is Park Chan-Wook’s English language debut and the change of language has changed nothing else, because the film is a stunning achievement and has all the hallmarks of the director’s previous work.  It is visually gorgeous to look at and the visuals themselves give the film a fairytale like quality to it all.  The film is blessed to have three generations of Australian actresses (Nicole Kidman, Jacki Weaver and Mia Wasikowska) fill the major female roles and they are all magnificent but it is Wasikowska as India Stoker who owns this film.  This is her most complex and best role to date and her character has one of the most complete arcs I have seen in a Hollywood film for quite some time.  What I loved about the film is the dark themes that are within it, something that Park Chan-Wook has never been afraid to tackle, and yet despite the darkness of theme, the film has been shot the opposite.  True, there are shadows always present on the edge, but it never envelopes the film fully and you can always see what is going on.  Being a huge Hitchcocck fan, I loved the allusions to his classic film “Shadow Of A Doubt”, with both films antagonists being an Uncle Charlie.  I also believe that the visual style of “Stoker” is very reminiscent of Hitchcock too and if Hitchcock were alive today, I am sure that this is the kind of film he would be making.  Also similar to De Palma’s “Passion”, this is a film that gets better with each viewing. Click here to read my original review.  


9.  DRINKING BUDDIES

This was the surprise of this year’s MIFF for me and was a film I almost didn’t end up seeing.  I was feeling so burnt out and wanted a break and was going to skip “Drinking Buddies” as I was only seeing it because Anna Kendrick had a role in it.  Thank god I changed my mind because I absolutely loved this film.  “Drinking Buddies” is actually a rare commodity in cinema because it is about friendship rather than love.  The film has a very real vibe to it all and this is because there was no dialogue written in the script, rather writer/director Joe Swanberg just wrote down the story beats and the dialogue was totally improvised by the actors themselves.  This is a dangerous technique for a film particularly if you have not cast the right actors, but Swanberg has done a stellar job in that department because both Olivia Wilde and Jake Johnson have the most natural chemistry I have seen on film in ages.  They work so well off of each other that you would swear that, like their characters, they were age old best friends.  My absolute favourite thing about “Drinking Buddies” though is that it doesn’t go for the cop out Hollywood ending with the two friends realizing they were perfect for each other and end up falling in love.  If that happened I would have been shattered, but thankfully Swanberg ends the film on the most perfect note.  While “Drinking Buddies” is only a small film, it is endlessly entertaining.  I love this film and recommend it wholeheartedly to everyone.  Click here to read my original review.


8.  WE ARE WHAT WE ARE

Jim Mickle’s “We Are What We Are” is almost the perfect remake.  Mickle has taken the basic elements from the Mexican original and taken the story in a completely different direction, complete with different locale.  While the original film is an urban drama, the remake takes place in a country town completely altering the feel of the film and separating itself to be its own being.  Both films deal with a cannibalistic family preparing a religious ritual, as the power shifts from one member to another after the leader of the family dies unexpectedly.  Mickle has added another subplot of a doctor searching for his missing daughter’s remains and whose investigations lead him to the Parkers, the aforementioned family.  The doctor is played by Michael Parks who underplays his role to perfection; he has a quiet presence throughout the film full of heartbreak and hurt.  Another change that Mickle made to the original was reversing the genders of all the main characters, so in this film, the leaders of the family are the females and it is up to 19 year old Iris to take her mother’s place after her death.  Knowing what comes with the leadership, Iris is reticent to take on the job and must rely on the help of her younger sister Rose.  As good as Ambyr Childers is as Iris, for mine, it is Julia Garner as Rose that steals this picture.  She is simply amazing and has such presence on screen that she out acts veteran actors three times her age.  My favourite thing about “We Are What We Are” though is, and this may surprise you, is the visual style.  Firstly, Liz Vastola’s costume designs, particularly for the girls, are just brilliant and give the film an otherworldly or “old” appearance even though the film is set in the modern day.  In terms of camera moves and shots, the film is shot very classically but Mickle has fun with a number of camera techniques such as overhead shots and the use of the split diopter.  Even when not using trickery, the film is always shot in gorgeous compositions creating quite the beautiful horror film.  Now as good as “We Are What We Are” is, it does stumble at the final hurdle with its terribly misjudged ending.  The film is never gory but for some reason Mickle decides to go for the gore for the finale and it is ludicrous and just does not fit the tone of the rest of the film.  It is a truly horrible ending but doesn’t quite undo this brilliant horror film.  Click here to read my original review.


7.  RUSH

I have already mentioned that Ron Howard’s “Rush” was my biggest surprise of 2013 and it really was.  When I started watching the film I had no expectations of it being any good at all and yet here it is in my top ten of the year.  I was literally blown away by the quality of the film; in all departments: directing, acting and production design.  Even though I had no interest in the subject of Formula 1 racing, the way that Howard has put this film together had me riveted the whole time.  I was on the edge of my seat through all of the racing scenes (it helped that I did not know the real life outcomes) and I loved how different both James Hunt and Niki Lauda were in their philosophies of racing.  Hunt had to do it because he was brilliant at it and had an undying passion to prove that he could be the best, while Lauda took a more mathematical approach in terms of getting ready (both his car and his own body) to get maximum performance when on the track.  No doubt both men were brilliant drivers though; the best in their time and their rivalry is thoroughly entertaining.  Both Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Bruhl are perfectly cast as Hunt and Lauda respectively, but it is Bruhl that takes the honours just for making the prickly and potentially unlikable Lauda, in fact likable.


6.  PRISONERS

French Canadian director, Denis Villeneuve’s “Prisoners” is quite a masculine piece of cinema and another real big surprise for me this year.  The story of a kidnapping of two young girls and the consequences that come after the said abduction is one of the most powerful films I saw all of 2013.  First and foremost, the performances of the two leads are truly stellar.  Hugh Jackman, as the aggrieved father, has never been better; it is such a strong and aggressive performance as this man is pushed to the limit in an attempt to find his daughter.  He is actually terrifying in just how far he is willing to go and the moral ambiguities of this film is another one of its strong highlights.  We know what Jackman’s character is doing is very wrong, but if it was our daughter would we not want to do the same?  Jake Gyllenhaal always seems to come across as quite young in film because of his baby face, but this is the first time that I have ever seen him come across as a real man.  He is so masculine and intense as Detective Loki, the man in charge of searching for the missing girls and keeping an eye on Keller Dover (Jackman) so he doesn’t do something he will regret.  This is actually the second of two films that Gyllenhaal has done with Villeneuve (the first film, “Enemy”, has yet to be released but is due early this year) and the director obviously knows how to get the best out of his leading man.  While Gyllenhaal’s role is much more controlled and internalized, it is just as full of testosterone as that of Jackman’s.  Probably the biggest surprise about “Prisoners” is where the film actually goes and just how dark it gets.  This is a brutal film with some graphic torture sequences that aren’t for the faint of heart but even with the film’s uncomfortable subject matter and its extended running time (“Prisoners” is just over two and a half hours long), it is always riveting; you cannot take your eyes off the screen and this intense tale.  That is the perfect word to describe this incredible movie: it is intense, and you may be surprised at just how emotionally involved you become with it too.  Special mention must be made of Roger Deakins gorgeous, but very dark cinematography.  He has made true beauty out of a number of very ugly situations.  “Prisoners” is a must-see and was the best thriller to come out in 2013.


5.  BYZANTIUM 

Irish filmmaker Neil Jordon may be the most underrated director working today.  There was a brief period where his genius was recognized (around the time of “The Crying Game” and “Interview With A Vampire”) but most of the time his work seems to get overlooked.  This is such a shame because he continually makes films that are well worth seeing and “Byzantium” may be the very best of them.  Like the film’s director, “Byzantium” itself may be 2013’s most underrated film.  This film saw Neil Jordan return to the world of vampires for the first time since his most famous film, and what he came up with is absolutely sublime.  I adore this film with a passion, in every way possible.  Personally I think Jordan is at his best with his fantastical films; films that live in a realm that is not quite reality.  He seems to have an ability to add a fairy tale quality to these films from “The Company of Wolves” to “In Dreams”, all the way up to “Ondine” and now his latest, “Byzantium”.  As I said, the film is a vampire drama but this is not a “Twilight” rip-off instead Jordan brings back the most vital component to a vampire tale; the fact that the vampire is a tragic character.  Their lives are filled with sadness and despair and their immortality may be a curse more than anything else.  The vampires of “Byzantium” are not your traditional sort (they don’t bite, they lacerate with a large finger nail that extends when ready to feed), rather we have a mother / daughter team (played by Gemma Arterton and Saoirse Ronan) on the run from their very own makers after breaking the sacred and secret code of their sect.  Tired of constantly running from town to town, Eleanor (Ronan) starts writing about her life and exactly what she and her mother are, and then shares these stories with a young boy she starts to fall in love with.  So we have the tragedy of a love story that will never be, as well as the tragedy of how the girls came to be which is reiterated to us (the audience) as Eleanor writes about it, so the movie cuts between the past and the present, and it is done so magnificently.  This is a slow moving film but personally I thought it was perfectly paced and the story was beautifully told.  Visually, the film was gorgeously shot by Sean Bobbitt (who is fast becoming one of my favourite cinematographers) who regularly frames the girls in the center of the shot with long halls or corridors enveloping them and making them look smaller.  I was stunned by how beautiful each shot in the film was, and one of the most stunning images in the film that you will see is of this giant blood waterfall.  Sadly this film went straight to DVD in Australia (it was originally set for a cinema release, but it never happened) but please do not let that cloud your judgment of the quality of this film.  This is a brilliant film, in all departments, that I hope more and more people take the chance to see.


4.  THE CONJURING

The best horror film of the year was, without a doubt, James Wan’s “The Conjuring” which was a throwback to the ghost stories of old.  Wan forgoes blood and gore to create a chilling film built on atmosphere and suspense with its best and scariest scene being one that is left totally up to the audience’s imagination (the shadow behind the door).  Wan’sdirection is very impressive (his best yet) and I loved the way he framed and composed the majority of his shots.  “The Conjuring” is actually based on truth of sorts, as the story has been taken from the files of real life paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren, who have been portrayed in the film by Patrick Wilson and the always fantastic Vera Farmiga.  Both bring a reality to their characters that is paramount to the success of the film because they sell that everything that they see, feel and hear is as real as anything else in the room, no matter how ridiculous it may seem.  Like all great ghosts stories of the past, “The Conjuring” builds slowly as the stakes continue to grow until the chilling finale, but what is interesting about this film is that while the film starts off as a ghost story, by the end of it, it has morphed into something else entirely.  It goes from a ghost story to a story about possession and it is the best example of possession I have seen in a film since “The Exorcist” which is the absolute highest praise I can give.  Personally I found the finale of this film to be absolutely terrifying and that’s because Wan was able to present the situation with the same reality as the rest of the film.  Aside from the horror aspects of the film, everything else about “The Conjuring” has been brilliantly put together.  The film is set in the 70’s and the period fashions and décor of the house is totally spot on.  Everything feels exact and of the era and the production design of the house itself is gorgeous with its run down look and lived in feel, giving it plenty of opportunity to help build the intense atmosphere of the film.  Another impressive bit of production design is the very creepy “trophy” room of the Warrens which houses mementos from all the cases they have been involved with, and because this is a James Wan film, it includes a very creepy doll.  Thankfully, audiences flocked to see “The Conjuring” and the film became a massive success which was well deserved because the film is brilliant and a new horror classic.  Click here to read my original review.


3.  THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES

Derek Cianfrance’s triptych of tales is really a complex look at fathers and sons, and how much their influence defines one another and whether or not sons are doomed to repeat the sins of their father, but it has been cleverly disguised as an involving crime drama.  As good as the genre elements are within “The Place Beyond The Pines”, make no mistake about it, it is the family elements that is what this film is truly about.  The film grabs you by the throat immediately in the fast paced opening segment that sees Ryan Gosling play a new father making the dubious decision to rob a bank to care and support his new family.  Luke (Gosling) is a stunt rider at a local carnival and he uses his amazing skills on a motorbike to help him with his robberies.  Gosling is yet again electric in the role of Luke, a no-hoper who dreams of doing good for his family.  It is an amazingly charismatic performance that is anchored by an emotional honesty that makes it easy to care for the man even though want he is doing is dumb, to put it lightly.  Bradley Cooper is equally impressive, as a cop who attempts to take on corruption within the force, even though his role is far less showy than Gosling’s and much more internalized.  Like all of the segments of this film, the second part is incredibly emotional because much of Avery’s (Cooper) pain comes from when he was injured on the job stopping an intruder entering a woman’s house.  Whilst stopping the man, he himself is shot but not before he kills the intruder with his own shot.  When he learns that the man he killed had a son the same age as his own, he is devastated and can’t bring himself to look at his child anymore due the guilt he is holding, so he basically abandons his son from an emotional standpoint.  After the cracking pace of the opening segment, there is a jarring effect when the second, slower segment begins but once you get to know the characters, the level of quality in regards to story is as equal as the first.The less said about the third sequence the better because it holds a few secrets better not spoken about but it is a real examination about whether or not sons are doomed to repeat the same mistakes of their fathers, as well as looking at the nature versus nurture debate.  “The Place Beyond The Pines” is a long film at close to two and a half hours but I was with it for every minute.  Not once did I feel bored or want to look at my watch.  The reason for this is that the characters and the actors playing them are naked, emotionally speaking.  Everything feels honest and real in all of the situations presented; nothing ever feels off.  Once again Sean Bobbitt’s cinematography is outstanding and yet, it is totally different from what he showed in “Byzantium”.  His work here relies a lot more on natural light and handheld camerawork is employed regularly and yet it is all extremely beautiful.  The other great positive “The Place Beyond The Pines” has is Mike Patton’s score which is never intrusive, nor does it attempt to influence you to feel a certain way, rather it elevated the emotional content present within the film.  “The Place Beyond The Pines” is just an amazing cinematic experience that I loved wholeheartedly.   Click here to read my original review.


2.  THE PAST

How do you follow up the masterpiece that was “A Separation”?  Well if you are AsgharFarhadi, thus arguably the greatest working director in cinema today, you just roll up your sleeves and make another film because while “The Past” may not quite be as good as its predecessor, it is almost better than anything else I saw all year.  Farhadi has created yet another spellbinding family drama with “The Past” but for the first time in his career, he is working outside of Iran and in a foreign language.  This new film is set in France, and it is amazing to notice how the change of language and location has not changed the quality of Farhadi’s work at all.  The reason for this is that Farhadi deals with human emotions that have no geographical boundaries; they are stories that everyone can relate to.  Like “A Separation”, this film although a drama is told in a style that is more akin to a thriller where we are given more and more information as the film goes along that ultimately changes everything we thought we knew from before.  What I love about Farhadi’s films is that he works in levels of grey; none of his characters are defined as good or bad, they are just people trying to deal with their own problems.  Seeing as how Farhadi deliberately holds back certain pieces of information from us, until he shares that information with his characters, it is best that I do not talk about the plot, but suffice to say this is a film about dealing with the past; trying to escape from it or coming to peace with it and how it is very hard to plan for a future until you have successfully done so.  What is interesting about “The Past” is that he starts the film in a very similar manner to “A Separation”, with our two main characters coming together in an attempt to get a divorce and end the marriage on good terms.  What is different about this new film though is that unlike the previous one, “The Past” is not shot in a documentary style, it is much more classically shot and it is gorgeous to look at.  I must say that with each new film Farhadi gets more and more comfortable with the visual side of his films and “The Past” is easily his best looking film.  I loved his use of the autumn colour palette; that is consistent with the colours within the house; the browns, yellows and dark greens.  I also like that Farhadi shoots through obstructions within the frame, like plants, glass windows, door frames so it gives us the feeling we are watching something private.  The intense conversations these people are having are not for stranger’s ears and thus it feels like we are catching these characters in private moments not meant for us.  Performances in “The Past” are all tops with Berenice Bejo showing stunning range especially compared to her role in last year’s “The Artist”.  However my favourite performance in the film is that of young Pauline Burlet who plays Lucie, the teenage daughter, in the film.  It is such an emotionally devastating performance and she is convincing in every frame she is in.  Her character arguably is carrying the most emotional baggage during the film, and it shows particularly in the why Burlet holds herself physically.  She drags herself around, with her shoulders slumped and her head down, never making eye contact with anyone; you can feel the emotional weight and guilt that she is carrying.  The only problem I have with “The Past” is that it is probably ten minutes too long, and Farhadi goes for one revelation too many.  Personally, I think less would have definitely been more in this case, but gee, this is another spectacular film from Asghar Farhadi that I just adore.  Click here to read my original review.


1.  BLANCANIEVES

So we have finally made it to my best film of the year and it was one of the first films I saw in 2013: Pablo Berger’s “Blancanieves”.  It was the only film that I gave five stars to this year so it wasn’t a hard choice at all, and even when I saw the film back in January I knew that it was going to be hard pressed for something to beat it as my favourite film of 2013.  The first time I saw the film was on my Spanish blu-ray that I had imported, but I was lucky enough to actually get to see “Blancanieves” on the big screen at MIFF later in the year, and the film impressed me all over again.  “Blancanieves” is actually the story of Snow White (yes, again) but told in the most original way.  First of all the story is set against the backdrop of matadors and bullfights.  Despite this, the story does stay close to the dramatic beats of the tale we all know and love but in such an original way that you can only be impressed by it.  From a filmmaking point of view, what makes this version of “Snow White” so impressive and original is that it has been filmed as a silent film and Berger does a stunning job of getting it so right.  It is glorious to look at and when you are watching it, you know you are watching something special.  What is sad about “Blancanieves” is in its timing of release.  When Berger first started working on this film eight years ago, the idea of making “Snow White” as a silent film set in 1920’s Spain was such an original idea, but when the film came to fruition and was finally released, it did so after two Hollywood versions of the “Snow White” tale came out, and a couple of months after “The Artist” had taken the world by storm.  I feel so sorry for Pablo Berger because I am sure that if “The Artist” did not exist or came out after “Blancanieves”, “Blancanieves” would be the film everyone would be talking about; instead it sadly got looked over as nothing more than a novelty, and it is something much grander than that.  Do not get me wrong, I love “The Artist” and are happy for its amazing success, but I think “Blancanieves” is the greater film in all facets.  Its story is more complex as are the film-making techniques, and importantly the film is not self-referential at all.  This isn’t a silent film about silent film, it is a beautiful tale told in the visual grandeur that was silent film.  Where the film does trump “The Artist” totally is in its magnificent score which was created by Alfonso de Vilallonga.  Actually everything about this film is glorious; the direction, the art and production design, Kiko de la Rica’s superb black and white cinematography, the razor sharp editing, and arguably best of all is Maribel Verdu’s wild and energetic performance as the villain of the piece.  I could gush about this movie ad nauseam, but instead I will just say that it is a stunning achievement in film and in filmmaking and I implore you to see it if you ever get the chance.  You will not be sorry because it is simply amazing and was the best thing I saw in 2013, thus making it my favourite film of the year.  Click here to read my original review.




Well there you have it, that was my  round-up of the year that was 2013.  Hopefully you got some enjoyment out of it, but before I finish, lets have a brief look at the upcoming year and my most anticipated films of 2014.