Saturday, August 4, 2012

THE BEAUTY FROM NIVERNAIS - MIFF 2012



This is a silent film from 1923 directed by Frenchman Jean Epstein and is a melodrama about a bargeman named Louveau who, one day whilst on shore on business, finds an abandoned young boy named Victor.  Finding no-one to claim the boy, he goes about adopting him and brings him back onto his boat much to the alarm of his disapproving wife.  She lets the boy stay overnight but explains that he must go back in the morning.  Immediately Victor gets along with the couple’s young daughter Clara and the two happily play as kids do.  From here the film cuts ahead to ten years into the future, and we see that the couple ended up bringing up Victor as their own son in that time, and he ends up being quite the helpful boatman to his adoptive father.  Louveau announces this will all be Victor’s and Clara’s in the future, talking about his business, which irks Louveau’s shipmate who has been with him since the beginning.  It soon becomes obvious too that Victor and Clara love each other in more than just a sibling way.  They spend the days on the barge together in each other’s arms or gazing into their eyes.  Eventually this perfect life is interrupted as Victor’s real father comes back to claim him, and the young lovers are torn apart.  Even though Victor is now brought up in a richer and more educated way, he dreams about his time back on the barge which is named “The Beauty From Nivernais” and of his lost love Clara.

This was the second film in a row that had to do with young people in love, admittedly the couple in this film are a little older than the ones in “Moonrise Kingdom”, and again I thought the love affair was handled really well.  The 1920’s were a different time, so the thought of a boy and a girl who have been brought up as siblings falling in love may seem a little strange today, but I love the way the affair was portrayed, so naively, so respectably and so innocently.  It was really beautiful.  

Compared with the flourishes of cinematic brilliance seen in Jean Epstein’s “The Faithful Heart”, you could look at “The Beauty From Nivernais” as nothing more than a conventional melodrama, but I much preferred the drama of this film than the more recognized “The Faithful Heart”.  It is true, the wild montage editing and superimpositions of that film, are almost absent from this one, but I felt much more moved by the performances of all the actors in “The Beauty From Nivernais” that I did not miss the brilliant technique from the other film.  That doesn’t mean that all technique is missing, as Epstein does use superimposition to good effect here, and he also lets a lot of the drama play out over the actors face in close-up too.

The only negatives I had with the film where the over-the-top and obvious acting of the “evil” shipmate, and I felt that the big dramatic scene of the impending barge disaster went too long that it lacked realism, but other than that I thought “The Beauty From Nivernais” was an outstanding achievement in silent cinema from the early 20’s by director Jean Epstein.


4 Stars.

MOONRISE KINGDOM - MIFF 2012



Let me preface this review by saying that I am a huge fan of Wes Anderson’s films and all the little quirks that come with them.  I love being able to recognize a director’s work knowing that no-one else in the world could have made them but them, and Anderson’s work is very easy to identify.  Then why was it that these quirks and visual motifs that are prominent in all of his films, seemed to irk me in “Moonrise Kingdom”.  Right from the opening shot of the film, where we are witness to rooms of young Suzy’s house, it just rubbed me the wrong way and I do not know why.  This is the stuff I usually love, but it just felt so self conscious here and so in your face that I reacted against it strongly.  I am also sick of Wes Anderson’s obsession with the colour yellow, enough already.

The film is about two twelve year old kids who, after inadvertently running into each other at a school play one day, fall in love and decide to run away together.  The young boy, Sam, escapes from his scout camp while Suzy leaves her well to do home (unnoticed until dinner time arrives) to meet at a predetermined destination decided between letters exchanged by the kids.  When it is finally discovered that they are missing, it sets about the parents of the children, the scout troop and a local cop to fan out to try and find the young children.  To make matters worse, a large storm is approaching the town.

I am at a loss as to why “Moonrise Kingdom” irritated me so much, I am hoping I just wasn’t in the mood for an Anderson film and that a second screening will find me loving it, especially due to the fact that a lot of critics have claimed it to be Wes Anderson’s best work yet.  Despite it annoying me, I did not hate the film, and that was mainly due to the fact that I loved the love story between the children that is the heart of the film.  It was beautiful seeing love portrayed so innocently, and the two actors that played Sam and Suzy (Jared Gilman and Kara Hayward respectfully) were magnificent, especially young Hayward, I thought that she was a revelation and seemed to act beyond her years.  The other standout was Bruce Willis who plays Captain Sharp, the sad police-officer of the town.  This was a splendid example of against type casting that worked beautifully.  I honestly would have never thought that Bruce Willis could fit so comfortably into one of Wes Anderson’s films, but he does just that and is a stand out.  The other actors are all fine, but something just felt amiss with the Edward Norton casting in the role of Scout Master Ward, he just feels quirky for quirky sake, which irritated me.

“Moonrise Kingdom” sees Wes Anderson tackle the familiar theme of dysfunctional families again, with Sam being an orphan, while Suzy lives in a two parent family even though no one communicates with one another except via the use of a loudspeaker.  She is thought of as a problem child, especially compared to her well behaved brothers and because of this she feels like an outcast.  She also struggles with the fact that she knows about her mother’s affair with the local policeman. 

Visually, the film looks just like a Wes Anderson picture as he has once again collaborated with Robert Yeoman as cinematographer, and as I mentioned before, the colour design of the film is heavily influenced by pastel colours and especially the colour yellow.  It had a kind-of been there done that feel to it, but I will admit I did like the look of Suzy’s pink dress she wears throughout the film.

Overall, I was very disappointed by “Moonrise Kingdom”, worse in fact, the film irritated me.  The love story at the centre of the film is actually beautiful and really well handled, but it was the Wes Anderson quirks that I normally love that drove me to distraction here.  The worst of which was Bob Balaban’s narration of the town and island, that was far too self consciously clever for its own good.  While the film looked good as usual, it unfortunately was nothing new, I had seen this all before from Anderson.  Personally I would have loved for him to focus more on the love story and leave behind all of his eccentric characters and quirks that he is now famous for.  As I said above, I hope it was just my mood of the day when I was viewing “Moonrise Kingdom” and that a second viewing may help in re-evaluating the film as brilliant, but as for now I can only just give the film a pass mark.


3 Stars.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

2012 Melbourne International Film Festival


Melbourne International Film Festival: August 2 - 19, 2012.


Well its that time of the year again when MIFF rolls into town.  Below is the list of titles that I am seeing, which will be updated with a star rating and a brief review after I see each title.  At the end of the festival, I will follow it up with my top ten list from the festival. 

Well, that's it for MIFF 2012.  Overall, I thought that it was a pretty good festival with a lot of good movies (and as usual, some duds too), but if I had to choose, I still think that last year's festival was better.  Not by much, mind you, though.  I greatly appreciated the inclusion of some silent films at the festival this year, and I hope to see some more again at MIFF 2013.  I was also devastated by the cancellation of the new extended cut of Sergio Leone's "Once Upon A Time In America" just days before MIFF opened.  I was so looking forward to see it on the big screen, but it wasn't to be, I guess.  Well, I guess it is time for my top ten films at MIFF 2012, so here they are in reverse order:

10.  AMOUR
9.  SOUND OF MY VOICE
8.  MANIAC
7. FOR LOVE'S SAKE
6.  BULLY
5.  JAYNE MANSFIELD'S CAR
4.  HIMIZU
3.  KILLER JOE
2.  THE HUNT
1.  FACING MIRRORS

So there you have it, for the second consecutive year, an Iranian film has been my favourite of the festival.  Unusual though, "Facing Mirrors" was the only film from Iran that I saw at this year's MIFF, but obviously its quality was so great that it still took my number one spot.