Monday, August 11, 2025

THE MASTERMIND - MIFF 2025

 

As per the MIFF guide: “Aimless J.B., a former art student who’s fallen on hard times as an out-of-work carpenter, has hatched a cunning plan: to steal a handful of paintings from a small museum outside of Boston. It may seem like a bad idea, but he’s got it all figured out … save for what to do with his kids while the theft is taking place, and what to do with the paintings once he has them.”

Coming into MIFF this year, I was elated to see that a number of my most anticipated films of 2025 had made it onto the programme. The first of these to actually screen for me turned out to be Kelly Reichardt's “The Mastermind” and the reason why I was looking forward to the film so much was because it felt so outside of Reichardt's usual wheelhouse. While it is true that this is her second consecutive film to deal with the art world, whereas “Showing Up” was about the process of making art, “The Mastermind” is actually an art heist film. The idea of Kelly Reichardt making a heist film had me intrigued, as I was sure that she would make it a unique experience, just due to the fact that this isn't the usual kind-of film that she makes, so she would see this genre exercise with fresh eyes. Obviously with “The Mastermind” being on my most anticipated list, I was expecting to like the film, but I wasn't expecting to end up liking it as much as I did; I absolutely loved “The Mastermind”!

One of the first things that caught me off guard with “The Mastermind” was the film's tone which was much lighter and more playful than I expected it to be. For some reason, I felt like it was going to be a very serious film, but hadn't realised that the title of the film is actually ironic. J.B is a lovable loser and the extent of his plan is to go into the museum in broad daylight and just take the paintings off of the walls. His dreams of an easy future filled with excessive cash are doomed before he sets his plan into action, simply because he has no ambition or will to follow through with anything in his life. Instead, by making this idiotic decision to steal these paintings, all he does is make sure that the lives of himself and his family are going to get worse. J.B is a total fuck-up, but still, through Josh O'Connor's charming performance, we want to see this man succeed, if only for the future of his wife, and his two young boys who idolise him. The film at times is also very funny too. One such moment is at the family dinner table, where J.B's father reads about the art theft in the newspaper and commenting “I'm not sure they have thought this through. Stealing such abstract artwork which would then make it so hard to sell on”. This comment make J.B irate with anger, but of course he cannot say anything about it.

One of my favourite aspects of “The Mastermind” was just how little dialogue is in the film, with large chunks of it being told only through it's images. We get multiple extended scenes where we watch characters doing things, with Reichardt focusing on the smallest of details, which is a little ironic as this is something J.B himself fails to do. Scenes of J.B casing the museum, the actual robbery of the paintings, and then the hiding of said paintings in a “secret, secure” location, are all done without dialogue and in fantastic detail, and for me, these scenes were the highlights of the film. In a way, these kinds of scenes are often the norm in heist films, as we watch intricate plans and details that need to come off perfectly for the job to be successful. Reichardt puts her own spin on this by showing us these same kind of scenes but for a robbery that hasn't been thought out or planned in any real detail, with the results being pretty funny. When dialogue is present within the film, it never feels out of place, it is light and conversational, never really focusing on the dire situation J.B has found himself in. The scenes between J.B and his old schoolmate Fred (played by Reichardt regular John Magaro), who agrees to hide out the wanted felon much to the chagrin of his displeased wife Maude, are another highlight, and just feel like two old friends catching up on lost time. Fred is in awe of J.B pulling off such a job, whilst Maude is able to see the real life dangers of associating with the thief, and is frosty because of this (despite their shared past together as old friends).

“The Mastermind” is a period piece set in either 1970 or 1971, set against the backdrop of the Vietnam War and the protests against it. The period detail in the film is just exquisite with locations, costumes, vehicles and props all outstanding in creating a believable 1970's world that feels truly lived in. Tiny things such as the metal alarm clock that J.B's wife throws at him, or the registration sticker on the car's windscreen add so much to the world created. Even the “classic” style of film making Kelly Reichardt and Christopher Blauvelt (her regular cinematographer) employ, help to create a film that you believe could be an actual relic from that era. Reichardt and Blauvelt chose to shoot “The Mastermind” on film (in 65mm no less) and it was an excellent choice, as it also adds greatly to the ambience of that time. Textures on fabric or wood, or the canvases of the paintings themselves are all heightened because of this photographic decision and the film looks sensational because of it. In regards to the Vietnam War aspect within the film, it is mainly in the background, playing on news reports on televisions or stories in the newspapers, and from time to time, we also see some physical protesters too. It is an added flavour within this world without it being front and centre, until the very clever and rather amusing finale to the film, where it ends up playing a large part in the conclusion.

An aspect of film making that I rarely talk about is music or a film's score, and that is mainly because I know nothing about the subject other than what I think may sound good, or work well for the film itself. I absolutely loved Rob Mazurek's score for “The Mastermind”!! It is jazzy in style, largely consisting of drums and trumpets, but it is just so damned cool. It is never used completely throughout the film, rather just to highlight certain moments and scenes, but it elevates the picture ten fold when the music is playing.

So was there anything about “The Mastermind” that I didn't like, you may be asking? Amazingly, yes! I absolutely hated the opening credits to the film which are presented onscreen top-to-bottom, as opposed to the usual left-to-right, similar to the way Japanese text is displayed in the credits of their movies, but with the text here in English. It was so hard on the eye to read and understand, and it also looked really cheap and crappy, and didn't fit the overall tone, nor the aesthetic, of the film itself. It is the film's biggest flaw, and it is right at the beginning. Thankfully, everything after this horrendous misstep is almost flawless though.

Overall, I was blown away by how great and entertaining Kelly Reichardt's crime caper turned out to be. It was completely different to what I was expecting and all the better for it too. It has a wonderfully charming lead performance from Josh O'Connor who makes us care for a lovable loser, whose every bumbling decision seems to put his and his family's lives further in trouble. The film making on display is second to none, with an eye on period detail that is impressive to say the least. I think this is Kelly Reichardt's most accessible film to date, and believe it will be a great success for her. I loved every second of it!


4.5 Stars.

 

Friday, August 8, 2025

2025 Melbourne International Film Festival


 
Melbourne International Film Festival: August 7 - 24, 2025.

Well its that time of the year again when MIFF rolls into town, and I thought that I would do something that I haven't done in over a decade which is to list each title I am seeing at the festival on one central page.  Below is the list of titles that I am seeing, which will be updated with a star rating after I see each title.  Unfortunately, unlike the times I have done this in the past, I will not be reviewing every film that I see, as I just do not have the time nor energy to review forty seven films.  To be honest, I would be surprised if I reviewed even half of them, but they will all definitely get a star rating though.  Those titles that I do review, will have links added to that said review on this page.  At the end of the festival, I will follow it up with my top ten list from the festival. 
 
 
Well, that's it for MIFF 2025.  Overall, I thought it was a very strong festival, but I thought that would be the case after Cannes this year had it's strongest line-up in a long while.  The majority of the films at MIFF were very good, with only a few duds out of everything I saw.  I guess it is time for my Top Ten List of MIFF 2025, so here they are in reverse order:
 
10.  THE THINGS YOU KILL
 9.  ONE MORE SHOT
 8.  BLUE MOON
 7.  THE WAVE
 6.  THE SECRET AGENT
 5.  REFLECTION IN A DEAD DIAMOND
 4.  LATE SHIFT
 3.  THE BLUE TRAIL
 2.  THE ICE TOWER
 1.  THE MASTERMIND
 
There you have it, my favourite film at MIFF this year was none other than Kelly Reichardt's "The Mastermind" which I actually happened to see on the very first day.  Look forward to doing it all over again next year for MIFF 2026.  See you then.
   
 

Monday, August 4, 2025

SENTIMENTAL VALUE

 
The winner of the Grand Prix Award at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival, Joachim Trier's “Sentimental Value” was a film that I was sure would turn up on the MIFF programme later in the year. However, very similar to what happened two years ago with Aki Kaurismaki's “Fallen Leaves”, I luckily happened to notice that “Sentimental Value” was actually playing as the centrepiece film of the Scandinavian Film Festival which is currently taking place in Melbourne across Palace Cinemas. This immediately ruled out a bow at MIFF, so whilst it would make seeing the film more difficult, there was no way in the world I was going to miss out on seeing this on the big screen, particularly after all the high praise it received at Cannes.

The Hurtigruten Scandinavian Film Festival guide describes the film like so: “Nora Borg is an established Oslo stage actress while her younger sister Agnes has chosen family life with her young son. Though markedly different, the two are close, having been raised by a single mother after their filmmaker father’s departure years earlier. When the once renowned Gustav attempts to cast Nora in his comeback film, old wounds reopen. Nora rejects his offer, prompting the isolated patriarch to cast American star Rachel Kemp instead. Suddenly, the two sisters must navigate their complicated relationship with their father and as Gustav and Nora attempt rapprochement, the already shaky foundation of the family unit is under threat of toppling.”

Going into my screening of “Sentimental Value”, I had just finished a ten hour shift at work and was also very unwell, so I was quite worried that if the film did not connect with me immediately, that I was going to struggle to focus on it and ultimately not like the film. Thankfully, I had nothing to worry about, as I was with this film right from the opening scene, and loved every second of “Sentimental Value”. For mine, this is Joachim Trier's best film to date, and the script that he and Eskil Vogt have put together is one of the most emotionally rich and thematically complex that I have seen in a very long time. It is also very raw and honest, and despite the title of the film, isn't overly sentimental either. The film tackles many things but it all feels so organic within itself and thanks to Trier's direction, it never feels heavy handed or too dark for the audience to handle or connect with. “Sentimental Value” is ultimately about family, grief, getting older, making peace with death, and the healing power of art. Each of the characters in the film are in so much pain, or dealing with a lot internally, but the drama comes from how each of these characters actually deal with what they are going through and how this affects all the relationships within their lives. Probably the best facet of “Sentimental Value” is that none of these characters are demonised for the choices they have made in their lives (at least, not by the filmmakers), but rather their stories are told honestly, flaws and all, which makes it feel so human and real. Something else that I must mention about the script, is that what isn't said by the characters is just as important as what is being said at times.

To pull off such a wonderful script, Trier needed to cast well and he has done just that, seeing him re-team with his “The Worst Person in the World” star, Renate Reinsve, who plays Nora, the older sister who is dealing with a whole lot of emotional baggage. Reinsve is outstanding in the role, as we get to see so many facets of this fascinating character, from when she is light and giggly while playing with her nephew, to the nervous and panicked actress before she steps out onto the stage, to the girl dealing with dark thoughts due to the neglect she felt from her father whilst growing up, to mention but a few. It is the flashiest role in the film, but she is so good at keeping it grounded and making it feel so real, wherever she may be on the emotional spectrum in any given scene. The scenes with her dad are so painful because you can feel how hurt she is, but you can also sense that all she wants is for her father to “see” her. She needs that recognition from him despite how much she says the opposite. One of the best scenes in the film is at the premiere of her play. She stands backstage focused (unusually for her), bathed in red, as she bursts on stage determined to give the performance of her life, because her dad will be in the audience. After the show, she is getting plaudits left, right and centre, but all she wants is some sort of praise from her father, which never comes because he never showed up for the show (convinced that Nora didn't really want him there in the first place). It is such a heartbreaking moment, which also devastates her sister Agnes, who can see the truth behind her sister's eyes, and which forces her to finally confront their father, which is something that is not normally within her nature to do. This brings me to Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, who plays Agnes, and whilst I am sure Reinsve will likely get all of the attention when “Sentimental Value” actually is released (and for good reason), personally I believe that Lilleaas is the film's secret weapon and the glue that holds it all together. Yes, her role is less flashy than Reinsve's but it isn't any less important, as Agnes is going through just as much as both Nora and Gustav, (particularly due to the fact that she is always stuck in the middle of them both), she just seems to be able to deal with her issues in a healthier fashion then the rest of her family. Because of this though, she is able to see just how much pain her father and sister are actually going through despite their efforts to hide it. Until this film, I was unfamiliar with Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas as an actor, but again, she is absolutely brilliant here, and holds her own beautifully when sharing the screen with both Reinsve and Stellan Skarsgård, who plays their father. In other lesser films, you would think that Skarsgård's character would be demonised as he is the essentially the cause of all the pain in the film, but instead Joachim Trier explores Gustav's own childhood pain which enlightens the audience to the reasons behind his cold upbringing of his own children. Again, Gustav feels real, human and yes, very flawed, but through delving into his past we are at least given reasons why he is like this, and once his children begin to understand exactly what he went through himself, they may realise that maybe life wasn't as easy for their father like they initially felt. Through Skarsgård's performance though, he makes Gustav an absolutely charming character; very flirty around the ladies, a serious artist when it comes to the making of his films, and a bit irresponsible when it comes to family matters. This last part actually leads to one of the funniest moments in the entirety of “Sentimental Value” when, at his grandson's eighth birthday party, he gifts him a handful of dvds. All of us film nerds in the audience roared with laughter when the titles are revealed as none of them are close to being appropriate for an eight year old, with Gaspar Noe's “Irreversible” and Micheal Haneke's “The Piano Teacher” being just two of the titles.

As of yet, I have failed to mention Elle Fanning and her character, Rachel Kemp, and if ever a character was going to become a caricature within the film and be made fun of, it would be her, but like all of his characters, Joachim Trier treats her with absolute respect and honesty. Yes, Trier does make fun of her entourage, clearly mocking the “hanger-on ers” that must exist in Hollywood, but he never makes fun of Kemp herself or her want to make the best film she can with Gustav, even when she is struggling to understand the true depth of his script. It is also in this part of the film that Trier makes a few salient points about how hard it is to get movies financed in today's landscape, where financiers are unlikely to put up cash for a movie without a “name” in the lead, as well as the demands streamers put on productions when they put money in to finance it. There is a scene where Gustav is horrified when asked if his new film will go out to theatres (as Netflix is co-funding it), and he says “of course it is! Where else would it play?”, whereas his producer interjects that they are trying to work something out with Netflix now so it will at least have limited screenings in theatres.

As I mentioned at the beginning, “Sentimental Value” is such a rich film, and there are so many elements about the film that I could still talk about, which would make this review go on forever, but one aspect I really must touch on is the healing power of art, and the way that both Nora and Gustav use their art to explore the pain they have experienced in their lives and give it an outlet. In a way, it is only through their art that both these characters deal with their pain honestly, as outside of it, they both hide behind the facades and walls they have built around themselves over the years. We are witness multiple times to Nora breaking down emotionally, and Trier often waits a while before he exposes the truth that she is just acting on stage and that this isn't a “true” breakdown, and yet, we also understand that Nora needs this because she is so reticent to let these emotions boil over in her real life. She tends to bottle everything up, and try to push through, so this release has to be good for, despite how brief a period it may only really help for. Gustav on the other hand, often tackles directorial projects that are personal to him and his life, and give him a chance to make sense of his childhood and the events that happened during them, particularly with his mother. He also uses his films to make a connection to his family members, casting them in roles, so he gives himself some time with them which he normally wouldn't have in his “real” life. One of the greatest scenes of “Sentimental Value” is during a screening of one of Gustav's older films, where a young Agnes played a key role in the film. Gustav is mesmerised by a close up of his daughter in the film, and we understand later why the scene is so important to him, and interestingly why it was so important to Agnes, with both being so different from one another. Finally, the power of art and it's healing capacities are also explored in the film's excellent finale, which I will not talk about or ruin.

Overall, I feel like I have barely scratched the surface about what makes “Sentimental Value” such a great film, it is so rich in content and emotion. Joachim Trier has created his best film to date here, in a story about multi-generational trauma, and the effects this trauma has on family relationships, as well as looking at how art can be used to begin to heal these relationships. It sounds like an incredibly heavy drama, and it does deal with a lot of deep subject matter, but it is never heavy handed nor a chore to sit through and the characters, as flawed as they all are, are a delight to be in their company for the entirety of the film. “Sentimental Value” has also been incredibly well written and performed by the whole cast. Whilst I admit that I am a sucker for stories that deal with father / daughter themes, there is so much else going on in “Sentimental Value” that I have no qualms about recommending this film to anyone who loves cinema. This is such a fantastic film that I am sure will be one of the best of this year.


4.5 Stars.