Thursday, January 1, 2026

2025 - IN REVIEW: GUILTY PLEASURE


 

THE MONKEY

I am a massive fan of director Osgood Perkins and am proud to say that I have been a fan of his since the beginning. Back in 2015, I totally fell in love his directorial debut, “February” (which was re-titled “The Blackcoat's Daughter” in the US) and have been a fan of his ever since. Starting with this first film, Perkins established his personal style which is all about mood and atmosphere, rather than blood and gore, although he is not afraid to show these aspects when it is right for his story. His movies are carefully constructed and slowly paced, stunningly shot in a way that enhances the dread of his stories, and he rarely, if ever, will fall back on something so basic as a jump scare. He creates fear in his movies through tension, atmosphere, character, and the story itself, not through unearned “boo” moments which is so rife in horror cinema today. Personally, I think he is a true auteur, and his style is easy to identify.

The Monkey” is also none of those things, as it shows a completely different side to Osgood Perkins. “The Monkey”, the first of two films Perkins released in 2025, excels in showing off the director's sillier side, as he has a ball with this over-the-top horror comedy. The film is actually based on a Stephen King short story, and is about twin brothers, Bill and Hal, who come into possession of a cursed toy monkey that they believe to be responsible for a series of very bloody and gruesome deaths. After their mother becomes one of the monkey's victims, the twins dispose of the toy by throwing it down a very deep well, thinking it destroyed and out of their lives forever. However, with the boys now grown, not to mention estranged, the toy monkey re-enters their lives and it's killing spree continues, forcing the brother's to reconnect in an attempt to stop the demonic plaything once and for all.

As you can tell from the above synopsis, “The Monkey” has quite a wild and goofy premise, and Perkins goes all out in telling this story as a very bloody and graphic splatter comedy. This is a very gory film, but it is all told with a wink and a nudge to the camera. It is not to be taken seriously, rather this is just a hell of a good time. More like the kind of scares you would find in a funhouse, just with lots (and lots and lots) more blood. Perkins has a ball coming up with all of the death scenes, and there is a huge number of them. You see, the toy monkey doesn't have the ability to kill anyone by itself, but through the demonic forces that are within it, it can control elements so deaths happen in the most unexpected of ways. In fact the film starts to play out a little like a “Final Destination” film, as we look forward to seeing just how each character is going to meet their demise. And unlike in all of his other films, Perkins is not subtle in showing these deaths. He understands that for this movie, the blood and the gore is the star of the show here, and he goes all out. Most people seem to love the girl jumping into the electrified pool, causing her to explode into body parts, but I really enjoy the real estate agent being shotgunned to death, point blank range, all over Hal. I also love a very simple death at the end, when a group of cheerleaders in a bus all get beheaded by a passing truck.

Theo James does an excellent job at portraying both twins, and making them completely different characters, Hal the quieter, more respectful brother, while Bill is a total dick. Despite the horror, there is also a nice father-son story line integrated into the film as well, to give it a little more depth, as Hal starts to reconnect with his own son, Petey, who he has neglected through his life due to the fear that he will mess it up for the worst. This reminds me, Elijah Wood has a very funny cameo in the film as Petey's stepfather, and Osgood Perkins himself also has a brief but hilarious cameo as Hal's uncle who, let's just say, isn't really fit for the job. I also must make mention of Tatiana Maslany who is very memorable as the twin's mother, despite her limited screen time.

Horror comedies are very hard to make, as trying to get the balance right between both aspects so they both work is almost nigh on impossible. “The Monkey” is much more of a black comedy, as it isn't interested in doing gags or jokes, as the characters themselves treat the story very seriously, it's just that the situations they find themselves in are rather funny for the audience watching, as are the character's reactions to said situations. Whilst this may constitute a spoiler, one aspect of “The Monkey” that I loved was it's apocalyptic-like ending, which strangely reminded me of similar endings in some of Kiyoshi Kurosawa's films like “Charisma” and “Pulse”, although the tones of those films are completely different.

 
I had such a good time with “The Monkey”, and I loved that it showed a completely different side to Osgood Perkins. If I was being honest, then yes, I do prefer the more serious version of Perkins, but I also have to say that it was so much fun to just sit back in a cinema and have a blast with a film like “The Monkey”, which is why is was my guilty pleasure of 2025.

 

2025 - IN REVIEW: TOP FIVE WORST FILMS

Let's make this clear, writing a "Top Ten" list for the worst films you have seen in a year is never fun and as such you find little inspiration while writing about them.  Because of this, I have decided to drop the number of films in this list to only five.  Again, due to my lack of inspiration, my reasons for disliking a film are probably not very deep, but here you have my   
 

TOP FIVE WORST FILMS OF 2025

5. MICKEY 17

The fact that this film has made it on to my “worst of” list of the year is a massive shock to me, not least because it was my most anticipated film of 2024. For whatever reason, the release date for “Mickey 17” ultimately was changed late so that it would end up premiering in 2025 and whilst my anticipation for the film was originally very high, I will admit that I was a little nervous about it when the early trailers for it arrived. Sadly these feelings would turn out to be prophetic, as for the first time in his entire career, South Korean director Bong Joon-ho has delivered an out-and-out dud. Almost nothing in the film works, with performances being sub par (outside of an entertaining Toni Collette), the film is ugly to look at, but it is the story itself that is the worst thing about “Mickey 17” as it is mind numbingly boring and at times confusing and pointless. I was also quite unimpressed with the special effects in the film, something that Bong Joon-ho has been excellent at incorporating into his other films so it all feels real and organic, but here just feels like a CGI mess. What is most shocking about all of this is that this is the first film Bong has released since winning praise and Oscars for “Parasite”.

4. VICIOUS

Sadly, these “worst of” lists are usually heavily populated by very poor horror films. There is such a glut of product within the genre, and the good ones are few and far between, so whilst I am a life-long horror fan, I try not to watch all the crap that is out there, and only watch the ones by filmmakers I trust (or if a film has great word-of-mouth). I am a big fan of director Bryan Bertino, and think his 2008 home invasion horror film “The Strangers” is something of a minor masterpiece. Since that film, Bertino has made a number of other interesting horror films, with varying degrees of success, with both 2020's “The Dark and the Wicked” and particularly 2016's “The Monster” being very impressive pieces of work. However, he also made “Mockingbird” back in 2014, which was absolutely dreadful, and at the time made me question if Bertino had the stuff to keep making new and fantastic horror films, or if “The Strangers” was just a fluke. He has since proved he is made of the right stuff, but sadly, “Vicious” is the worst thing he has made since “Mockingbird”. Whilst not even close to being as bad as that film, “Vicious” fails to make a lot of sense, nor put the audience even on edge, let alone be scared. It also feels entirely pointless, and something of a rip off of Richard Kelly's 2009 film “The Box” (which is a much better film than this). I will say that the film looks great, and Dakota Fanning gives her all in the lead role, but it is all for nought in this seriously unsatisfying horror film.

3. SHELL

I will admit upfront that my memory of “Shell” borders on non-existent, as I seemed to forget almost everything as soon as the credits rolled. I do remember that I was looking forward to the film, as it was a different take on what women are willing to do to themselves to stay looking younger for longer, or what they feel they must do to appeal to men for longer, be it in a working or loving environment. This topic was tackled in the balls-to-the-wall horror film, “The Substance”, last year, which was not afraid to take the subject as far as humanly possible. Maybe “Shell” is a product of bad timing, coming so soon after “The Substance”, as it will forever be compared to that film, but “Shell” is a much more anaemic effort, despite how batshit crazy it also goes at times. You would think that a film that has a young model turn into a giant crustacean by it's end, would be a lot more fun than it turns out to be, but “Shell” is just a very dull film, that thinks it is much more taboo breaking than it really is. The film's biggest problem though is in its miscasting of Elisabeth Moss (an excellent actor in her own right) in the lead role.

2. SANATORIUM UNDER THE SIGN OF THE HOURGLASS

Whilst I will concede that there is definite art involved in the creation of the Quay Brother's latest stop motion feature “Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass”, the film that has been delivered is a total mess and almost incomprehensible (for me, at least). I am not a total novice when it comes to the brother's previous work and understand they focus more on their visuals and how they haunt the audience, rather than to tell a straight forward story that is easy to decipher. Knowing this though did not help me and whilst I did like some of the silent film-like aesthetics and thought the sound design was very impressive, I just could not make heads or tails out of the story at all, which made it a very frustrating watch. Personally, I put the blame squarely on the Quay Brothers as it is their job as directors to make their story accessible to the viewer, which they have not done here. Yes, some of the visuals are beautifully macabre and creepy, but the images do not help in telling the story. More often than not, they actually confused me more. What is interesting is that the Quay Brothers have stayed true to their aesthetic they created for all of their animated shorts, which I applaud them for that, but the way the animation has been shot creates this weird diffused look, that at times your eyes struggle to be able to understand what they are looking at. The images are dark and foggy, almost like an old photograph that is fading or that wasn't developed properly. Your eyes feel like they are constantly adjusting to a darkened room, as they search for the puppet onscreen. At the time of my screening of the film, I didn't realise why this may be, but I now think it is due to the fact that the brothers no longer shoot on film but digitally, which has affected the quality of their images. The other thing I really hated about the film was it's overly florid dialogue, which I am sure is meant to be poetic, but had me rolling my eyes, as again it made the story inaccessible and harder for the viewer to find a doorway in to enjoy the film. Click here to read my original review.

1. BEAST OF WAR

My least favourite film that I saw in all of 2025 was the Australian shark movie, “Beast of War”, directed by Kiah Roache-Turner. I have been a fan of Roache-Turner's previous films, particularly his zombie epics “Wyrmwood” and it's sequel, and think he has a real knack at hiding his low budgets and giving his films a more epic feel than the budget should actually allow. Hearing he was doing a new shark film, I thought it was going to be bloody and awesome, but I found it to be a total embarrassment, and the thing that I thought was Roache-Turner's biggest strength, let him down with “Beast of War” as the film looks like a group of actors thrashing around in a tank rather than the ocean like it is meant to. The film looks so cheap and nasty, and whilst the shark itself has an impressively snarling and teethy face, he is always shot in the same way during an attack: front on and in slow motion, so it becomes very boring, very quickly. The acting within the film is terrible, with the dialogue even worse.......I hate to say it, but I felt uncomfortable watching “Beast of War” due to how bad I found it. My screening was actually the world premiere of the film and was attended by the director, the cast and the crew of the film, who all seemed to have a blast with it. As I have said though, I thought “Beast of War” was utterly dreadful, in every way, and I must admit that I have been surprised that my horror community has ended up accepting the film and enjoying it a whole lot more than I did. Unfortunately, I found nothing to recommend about “Beast of War” and worse, I found it boring as all hell, which is the biggest crime a shark movie can commit, which is why it is my least favourite film of 2026.  Click here to read my original review.

 

 

2025 - IN REVIEW

 




So it has come to that time of the year again where Top Ten lists become the norm, so I guess I have to add my two cents to the discussion.  While the majority of what is to come is going to be a celebration in cinema for the year that was 2025, there is also the inevitable Top Five Worst Films list.  Below are the categories I am going to be discussing in regards to 2025, so sit back and enjoy.  Remember that these are my lists and you can disagree with them all you want.


MOST UNDERRATED FILM OF 2025
TOP TWENTY FILMS OF 2025  #20-11  #10-1

Once each segment has been posted I will add the link to it on this page.  So let's begin shall we?