Wednesday, November 11, 2015

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (Panna a netvor)




One of the great joys about cinema and being obsessed with it, is when you come across a director whose work you have previously been unaware of and then connecting with their work and finding hidden gems. Such is the case with Czechoslovakian director Juraj Herz, who until about a month and a half ago, I didn't even know existed. Whilst doing some research on great and unknown foreign horror movies, Herz's name seemed to pop up regularly and this led me to look closer at the man's filmography. I was stunned when I came across the fact that he had made a version of the “Beauty and the Beast” fairytale and that it was highly regarded; stunned by the fact that I had never heard of it before. Personally I am a massive fan of Jean Cocteau's rendition of the same story, “La Belle et la Bete”, due to its sumptuous beauty and poetic nature, and always thought this was the definitive version of the story, but I was more than eager to try and track down Herz's version and give it a spin. Thankfully I was successful in my search, and now have decided to review it, so did it do the impossible and best the Cocteau version, was it a pale imitation or did it create a whole different kind of magic?

This version of the classic tale remains basically the same with a well to do merchant dealer going broke after his shipment of goods gets destroyed, this time whilst the people delivering the cargo attempt to pass through the haunted black woods (home of the Beast). With nothing to his name, the man must sell all his earthly possessions to pay off his debts. Once this is done, all that is left is a portrait of his second wife and mother to his third and youngest daughter, Julie. Since the frame the painting is encased in is of considerable worth, he heads off to sell the portrait in an attempt to gain enough money to start life anew. His two eldest daughter's demand gifts of jewels and diamonds upon his return, whilst the young Julie's only wish is for a single rose. The father heads off and after getting himself lost, ends up travelling through the dreaded black woods. He comes across a run down old castle, and helps himself to both food and drink that are there, as if waiting for his arrival. He falls asleep in front of the fire and when he awakens he finds that the portrait is gone, and in its place is a wealth of jewels, coins and diamonds. The man is ecstatic and takes his leave, but upon exiting, he notices a beautiful white rose. He picks the rose for Julie, when he is then stopped by the angry beast. Enraged at the gall of the man in attempting to steal his rose, after all that he has given him, he tells the man that he is to die. His only chance of survival is if one of his daughter's takes his place willingly. The man understands his doom and accepts it, but asks the beast for a couple of days grace to set his family up before he returns. The beast agrees. When the father gets home, he relates his story to his daughters, but it is only Julie that hears his words and without hesitating she takes off into the woods to take her father's place and to be this mysterious beast's prisoner.

This is an amazing movie and I thoroughly loved every second of it. Whilst I do not think it is better than the Cocteau version, I believe it is no less a stunning picture for it. In fact the two pictures are quite different with Herz's version being a much darker and Gothic affair that it borders much closer to a horror film. Any one who knows me, knows that two things I absolutely love are fairy tales (the darker the better), and horror films and I believe that cross over of each into the other is always ripe because they both seem so closely related. As I have said, this version of “Beauty and the Beast” is a much more terrifying version but no less magical or beautiful.

Juraj Herz has added a lot of little touches to the story to make it his own, most notably in regards to the beast himself and his abode. The single greatest moment in the film is when we see the beast for the first time. In all previous versions of this story that I have watched, the appearance of the beast is more akin to that of a cat or bear, or a combination of the two. Here however, the beast is a giant bird like creature. My mouth just dropped agape at this revelation and originality of his design and it just felt so right. It made so much sense that the beast could look like this in this world; with his large head and face full of beak, not to mention his sharp taloned hands that look ready to rip anything to shreds if so he desires. This beast is a terrifying incarnation and not the sad, lonely cursed figure he comes across in some versions (even though he is that here too). Another addition to the beast here is the fact that he is constantly fighting within himself to embrace his darker animal nature and to kill Julie. The voices in his head all tell him that he must do it to survive, but he constantly fights against this in an attempt to have some semblance left of being human and thus have a chance at redemption. Personally I love this added bit to the story because it makes the beast that much scarier knowing he is slightly insane too. What is interesting too is that the longer Julie stays with him, the more she changes him and makes him more human, both figuratively and literally (as you can see from the photo above, Julie changes the beasts terrifying claws into human hands when she touches them one night). The dark side of the beast finds this a threat and is constantly trying to show him how weak he has become the more human he has become.

The castle that the beast lives in is also treated quite different here in that in this version it is more of a run down old ruin, and yet there is still a beauty to it, and it is full of such magic. Whilst Julie believes that this magic starts the fires and sets the tables with food when needed, what she cannot see is that the beast has a number of hidden “Gollum” like minions who perform these tasks from the shadows. It is quite the image witnessing a chandelier descending with one of these dark servants aboard it lighting the table's candles. One of my favourite scenes in the film is when Julie is dancing and playing with the beast's statues that all exist in a hallway. She takes their hands and admires their faces, all while prancing around them in happiness. That night though, the beast destroys each of the statues removing their hands and face, for he is jealous because he wishes Julie that they were his hands and face that Julie was admiring, but knowing that can never be. When Julie sees the destruction the next morning, she begins to weep and it is such a beautiful moment.

In regards to Julie, the “Beauty” of the film, it is really hard for Herz to make any sort of significant impact on her to make her character his own, so she remains relatively the same as in the other versions; the picture of innocence, beauty personified and with a heart full of love. She is played by Zdena Studenkova, who does an admirable job in the role. Although she is very innocent, she is a strong character and at times quite stubborn. One scene that I liked towards the end was when she first sees the beast's face, and attempts to love him for who he really is, only to retract in horror after staring at his visage too long and realising that he is too frightening to love. I must admit I was not expecting this moment at all, as I thought it would be more cliché and that she would see beyond his looks and love him, but instand she hurts him be rejecting him just as he exposes his vulnerability and shows her who he really is. From a visual standpoint, my favourite moment involving Julie is when she drinks the drugged drink and falls in slow motion, asleep onto her bed. It is a beautiful fairytale moment.

In fact the whole film is a visual feast, with Herz having great fun with both darkness and light, with Julie constantly bathed in soft beautiful light, whilst the beast is hidden within the dark shadows of the castle. From a shot perspective, Herz is very inventive choosing interesting angles always, often shooting through objects to give you the feeling you are participating with the film in a voyeuristic capacity much like the beast himself. His use of colour is especially well done and although it may be a cliché, I loved that Julie was always dressed in white compared to the beast's black. The scenes in the snow with the beast watching from above were particularly well handled.

Overall, I fell in love with Juraj Herz's version of “Beauty and the Beast” and have in fact already watched it twice. It is a thrilling dark take on the classic tale and I loved all of its Gothic styling. Also unlike the recent “Crimson Peak”, this Gothic tale did the right thing by having the castle burn down at the end. The imaginative choice to make the tormented beast a bird like creature was the absolute highlight of the film for me, and just for this choice alone I can not recommend this film enough. Since watching this film, I have been able to track down a few more of Juraj Herz's films; “Morgiana” (not bad, if a little slow) and “Ferat Vampire” (disappointing), although none best his version of “Beauty and the Beast”.......yet. My one hope now is that someone releases this beautiful film on blu-ray in the very near future. Either way, I'm sure that I will continue revisiting this stunning film regularly.


4 stars.


No comments:

Post a Comment