Fans of
Spanish filmmaker Alex de la Iglesia are in for a treat this year, as he has
followed up his wild and crazy film from last year, “The Last Circus”, with
this year’s “As Luck Would Have It”. It
is such a rare treat to have two new films from this amazingly inventive
director in two consecutive years.
Compared to the absolute insanity and anything-can-happen mantra of his
previous film, “As Luck Would Have It” is a much more subdued and controlled
effort from de la Iglesia, and as such, is arguably his most accessible film in
years.
The film
is about family man named Roberto, who at one time was a legend in the
marketing and advertising world after coming up with his catchy and
multi-million dollar making slogan “La chispa de la vida” (which means “the
spark of life”) that he came up with for Coca Cola. Unfortunately Roberto has fallen on hard
times due to the European economic crisis and hasn’t worked for years. He is months away from becoming bankrupt and
losing it all, a fact that he keeps hidden from his beautiful wife Luisa, and
as a last ditch effort he goes to an old friend who is still in the industry
and basically begs for a job. However
now that he is no longer hot property, his friends at the advertising company
want nothing to do with him, and Roberto is humiliated.
In an
attempt to cheer himself up, he heads to the hotel where he and his wife shared
their honeymoon together. He plans to
have a romantic weekend with the love of his life by booking the same room, but
such is his luck that when he arrives at the location of the hotel he finds
that it is no longer there, and that it has been replaced with a museum. In fact, under the site where the hotel
originally sat, a massive archeological discovery has been made, as they have
found an old Roman amphitheatre still largely in good condition. Roberto ends up wondering into a press
conference being held about the discovery and while trying to find his way out
ends up in a part of the museum still under construction. A security guard startles Roberto and he
stumbles, falling from a great height and impaling his head, upon impact, onto
an iron rod. Although he survives the
fall and is even able to move all of his limbs, he is still unable to move due
to how far the rod is embedded into his skull (and possibly his brain). Soon the attention of all of the reporters is
no longer on the museum but rather on Roberto and his amazing survival. Suddenly a man who only hours earlier no-one
had the time of day for, now has the attention of the entire nation. Immediately advertisers, television shows and
even movie producers all start calling, and Roberto realizes he is in the box
seat to rid himself of all his debts and to provide for his family’s future.
“As Luck
Would Have It” is a biting satire of the world today as it examines just how
far big corporations are prepared to go in an attempt to make money at the
expense of an individual. It also looks
at current media saturation and how we all seem to get something out of
witnessing another person’s misery or pain.
The exploitation of Roberto would be quite sickening except that he is
complicit in it all, in an attempt to provide for his family a better future. Being in the advertising world, he knows how
much his pain is worth and he goes about setting the price. He hires an agent immediately who starts the
ball rolling with small stuff like product placement (advertisers get their
product to be placed near Roberto’s body) until they decide to go big an offer
an exclusive interview with one of Spain’s huge hotshot talk show hosts for
massive money. It is during the
negotiations here that we are witness to one of the most disgusting elements of
the film, when the hosts says that he will pay for the exclusive if it can be
guaranteed that Roberto will die on camera.
His reasoning for this is that a tragedy always rates better than a feel
good story. He explains this by
mentioning that the reason no one remembers the Chilean miners anymore is
because they all survived. This is quite
a biting section of dialogue but sadly it also rings true. It is obvious that no one really cares about
the “man” at the heart of the story, it is the story itself that is all that
matters. However like I said, Roberto is
fully aware of all this and as such slants everything towards his family benefit.
“As Luck
Would Have It” is unique in the entire canon of de la Iglesia’s films because
this is the first time that he has no writing credit at all on one of his
films. I suspect that this is the main
reason for the quick turnaround from “The Last Circus” to “As Luck Would Have
It” as the script would’ve been ready to film straight away. This time the script is credited to Randy
Feldman who was amazingly the writer of “Tango & Cash” many moons ago, as
well as the Van Damme vehicle “Nowhere To Run”.
Since then he appears to have done basically a few television episodes
and that is it, so I am not sure if this was an old script lying around that de
la Iglesia has just come across. It
appears that it was originally written in English and translated later into
Spanish, but it seems perfect for de la Iglesia’s sensibilities, who is a
director who always loves to add comedy (even of the blackest variety) into his
films. While the film does make some
good points about today’s society, it almost feels as though it is too
safe. I felt it should’ve gone darker
and maybe even more towards the absurd.
Let’s face it, Alex de la Iglesia is a master of the absurd and we all
love it when he takes us to these places, but unfortunately he isn’t able to
here and as a result the film does not soar like I wish it would. De la Iglesia is a visual genius, but he is
hampered here by the fact that his main character is unable to move, so we are
not treated to as many visual flourishes as we would expect from a de la
Iglesia film. Still the few that he does
give us are very nice (I very much liked a shot from under Roberto that is near
the end of the film).
The
performances from the main actors are what really keep the viewer engaged in
the story of “As Luck Would Have It”.
Apparently Jose Mota, who plays Roberto, is actually a comic and this is
his first starring role in any film. He
does a marvelous job in the role and brings a real heart to it. Although his situation is absurd he plays
Roberto straight, there is no winking at the camera or anything like that, to
him the situation is as real as it gets – he has a rod in his head and in all
likeliness he will not survive the night.
You really feel for him in the beginning as he feels like a failure who
is letting down his family. The way Mota
holds himself is important as he is slouched over, tired looking and does not
exude the confidence needed in the industry he was once employed in. However we see this confidence returning as
he begins to provide for his family while impaled. Because Mota is stationary the majority of
the performance is done through the eyes and he is really powerful here. It seems strange casting a comedian to play a
very still part, but casting against type has worked incredibly well for de la
Iglesia here.
The real
standout in the film, though, is Salma Hayek as Roberto’s wife, Luisa. It must have been a real coup for de la
Iglesia to snag this high profile Hollywood actress for his film. This is the first time I remember seeing
Salma in anything where she speaks her native tongue (although I stand to be
corrected) and she really is powerful in it.
Her role is the heart of the film because Luisa is torn between letting
her husband’s pain (and her family’s) to be exploited because she knows that as
disgusting as it is, it is making Roberto feel like he is again providing for
his family which she knows he needs.
Still she is repulsed by the vulture like media presence and only offers
an exclusive interview with a young female journalist who had the decency to
turn her camera off after witnessing a particularly private moment between the
doomed husband and his wife. The early
scenes between Roberto and Luisa when he is getting ready for his job interview
are also great and Hayek is really bubbly and vibrant in these scenes as a wife
who still believes in her husband during these difficult times. She expresses a huge positive energy trying
to get him up for the interview, and Hayek is just so charismatic here. It is obvious she loves this man through and
through, and I thought the chemistry between the two of them was very
realistic.
The
other star of the film is Carolina Bang who plays the role of the reporter who
Luisa gives the exclusive to. Bang
played the main female role in de la Iglesia’s previous film “The Last Circus”
and it was good to see him working with her again in a much different
role. I was very impressed by her
performance here because while I was aware of her incredible good looks, I felt
her work could have been stronger in the previous film. Here though she comes across as very
intelligent and as a woman who has a lot of heart and importantly a conscience
which appears rare within the media.
Again she is gorgeous to look at, but not in an overtly sexual way like
in “The Last Circus”. I’ve got to say I
really loved her in “As Luck Would Have It”.
The
Spanish title of the film is actually the phrase that Roberto came up with for
Coca Cola, “La Chispa de la Vida”, which means “the spark of life” and is
apparently the real slogan Coca Cola uses in Spain. Personally I feel that this is a much better
title than the English one because while it also has relevance to the actual
plot of the film, it is much closer to the themes of the film. For Roberto, the spark of his life is his
family and he does everything for them in this film. Due to the nature of the film itself, de la
Iglesia was restricted to very few locations in the film, but the Roman
amphitheatre is a perfect spot for the majority of the film, as it is like a coliseum
with the media gathered around watching a blood sport put on for them (ie. They
are waiting for Roberto to die to make their story more grand).
Overall,
while I did enjoy de la Iglesia’s latest effort, I did feel that it was a
little more generic than I am used to from this director. I wanted it to go darker with the comedy and
for it to have a little more bite than it ended up having. Sadly due to the nature of the story, de la
Iglesia’s visual flourishes were sadly absent but the performances more than
made up for it. Again, I will state that
I did like “As Luck Would Have It” but there was a feeling at the end of the
film that was kind of like “Well…..so what?”.
It didn’t shine like I wanted it to, but I would happily watch it
again. For fans of the Spanish director
it may come as a disappointment especially after the insanity of “The Last
Circus”, but I certainly do not think it is as bad as his “The Oxford Murders”.
3 Stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment